HELENA - Montana's Congressman, Denny Rehberg, today released the text of his speech to a Joint Session of the 62nd Montana State Legislature. Each member of Montana's congressional delegation is invited to address the Legislature every two years.

In his speech, Rehberg addresses the increasing tension between states' rights and federal power, especially with regard to wolf management, health care, national monuments and burdensome regulations. He makes the case for limited, enumerated federal authority, consistent with the United States Constitution.

Address to Joint Session of Montana's 62nd State Legislature

Montana's Congressman Denny Rehberg

Monday, February 7, 2011

Thank you, Speaker Milburn and President Peterson. Addressing the Montana Legislature is always a high honor for me and also a bit of a homecoming.

I look around this Chamber and I see a lot of my old friends and former colleagues. Your faces remind me of all the ways we have worked together to serve the people of Montana - and make sure our state remains a great place to start a small business or to raise a big family!

Of course, it's good to see a lot of new faces out there as well! Congratulations to all of you who have taken your seats in this Legislature for the first time. Last November, people across Montana and across America spoke with a clear voice. Today, they speak through your voices.

I know you will never forget what an honor it is to serve our state. On January 5th of this year, I took an Oath of Office myself once again. As in this Chamber, there were a lot of new faces as well. Like today, there was a man who was new to the title of "Speaker" but who wore it very well!

The Oath I took was to support and defend the Constitution of the United States and to "well and faithfully discharge" the duties of my office. My purpose today is to share with all of you how I propose that the new Congress and this new Legislature can work together effectively and live up to our Oaths together.

As you know, there are two basic visions of how the federal government should be in relationship with the states and rarely in American history has the difference between those visions been more obvious. One vision, paternalism, has been guiding the power brokers in Washington over the last two years.

It's the idea that the federal government knows best; it's the idea that state legislators like you need to be told what to do; it's the idea that the American people just need to shut up and let the "experts" do their thing.

I for one am glad that the American people did not shut up; and I'm glad they have rejected the insufferable arrogance that they saw coming out of Washington, DC.

The American people showed they believe in the second vision which is called states' rights. It's the idea that the people are the experts and that the best government is self-government; it's the idea that the states created the federal government not the other way around and that states like Montana remain the best "laboratories of democracy" in the entire world; It's the idea that Washington has important responsibilities but limited powers and that when Washington tries to do too much, most of the time it tends to screw things up.

Like most Americans I believe that states' rights is the right vision. Why? One reason is that our Founders got a lot of things right.

One of them, James Madison, wrote in the Federalist Papers that "The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the federal government are few and defined. Those which are to remain in the State governments are numerous and indefinite."

Another Founder, Thomas Jefferson, wrote this: "The several states composing the United States of America are not united on the principle of unlimited submission to their general government;"

Madison and Jefferson were smart guys - but I say if you want to understand the wisdom of states' rights, you don't need to read about it in a history book. You can see it right here in the assembled representatives of the Montana Legislature.

As members of the Montana Legislature, you represent the character and vitality of our great state. Some of you are job creators and running your own small businesses. Some of you are public school teachers - and helping our children realize their full potential. Others work in health care, energy, and other fields where technology is creating opportunities that our parents never dreamed of. I see a few fellow parents in this Chamber by the way - and a few grandparents as well.

All of you have one thing in common - every single one of you is a citizen-legislator. The taxes you raise you will have to pay, the regulations you impose, you will have to comply with. You don't have to visit your constituents - you are your constituents, and your perspective will guide you to govern well.

My job as your Congressman is to defend the states' rights principle in Washington. That means focusing on the core responsibilities of the federal government; that means getting Washington off the backs of our people - as well as legislators like you in state capitals across America. And that means ending federal management of the gray wolf population here in Montana.

Unfortunately, the only thing growing faster than the gray wolf population is the number of obstructionist environmental groups and their lawyers. Environmental obstructionists found a federal judge in Missoula that was willing to ignore the scientific evidence as well as the expert opinions of on-the-ground wildlife managers here in Montana. And he ruled last August that the grey wolf had to remain on the Endangered Species List.

When I first heard his decision, like many of you I wanted to take action immediately. I asked: how can we put some of these judicial activists on the Endangered Species List? I am still working on that! But in the meantime, I have introduced legislation that would permanently end federal jurisdiction over the gray wolf population - and return responsibility to the wildlife managers here in Montana.

By the way, I am glad to hear that Senator Baucus supports the federalist principle when it comes to the gray wolf population. I understand he told this Chamber a few weeks ago that: "Montanans, not Washington bureaucrats, know best how to manage wolves."

That was well said.

But I wonder when he's going to figure out that Montanans, not Washington bureaucrats, know best how to manage our own health care too!

You don't need me to tell you that the new federal health care law is one of the biggest affronts to states' rights in American history. Some Americans call this law "ObamaCare." But two federal judges have now called it "unconstitutional."

Keep reading for FREE!
Enjoy more articles by signing up or logging in. No credit card required.

We knew some of the bad news on the front end: It's got half a trillion dollars in higher taxes; Another half trillion in cuts to Medicare; And thousands of pages of red tape.

But somehow the more we learn about the new health care law, the less there is to like.

We have discovered that the new law imposed a huge burden of paperwork on small businesses by requiring them to submit countless "1099 Forms" to the IRS. We have heard that the employer mandate is so onerous that it may be cheaper for some employers to just pay the fine and eliminate health insurance coverage for their current employees. We have seen how the Obama Administration has granted "waivers" from its own health care law for more than 700 organizations a lot of them unions and the big dogs who can afford to hire the best-dressed lobbyists in Washington. And legislators like you have learned the full extent of the unfunded mandate imposed through the expansion of the Medicaid program which in our state is estimated to blow a hole in our state budget of more than $100 million through 2019.

I appreciate that the Supreme Court may ultimately declare the health care bill unconstitutional. I certainly hope they do so if it comes to that as a matter of law. But Congress passed this law so Congress can repeal it. And on January 19th, I was proud to stand with 244 of my colleagues as we voted to repeal this terrible law.

Unfortunately we can't repeal the failed stimulus bill or all the other reckless federal spending over the last two years because the money's already out the door. You all know the numbers: the federal budget deficit this year will be over one trillion dollars for the third straight year, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office; Washington now borrows more than 40 cents of every dollar we spend; and our federal debt has grown to an unbelievable 14 trillion dollars.

All this spending has been unsuccessful because it didn't keep our national unemployment rate below 8 percent as the White House promised. And a lot of this spending has been just plain dumb: the Obama Administration sent about 89,000 stimulus checks to dead people; the stimulus bill also included: $1.9 million for international ant research; $700,000 to study why monkeys respond negatively to inequity; And nearly $200,000 to study voter perceptions of the stimulus bill itself!

Here in Montana, we were promised that millions of stimulus dollars would go to the Whitetail Port of Entry until the Canadians decided that 5 vehicles a day wasn't worth their own taxpayer dollars and decided to close their side. And in what has to be the most ironic earmark of them all the omnibus spending bill that was blocked in the Senate right before Christmas included more than $700,000 to compensate ranchers in Wisconsin, Minnesota, and Michigan whose cattle are eaten by ... you guessed it ... endangered wolves!

But the biggest travesty of Washington's stimulus spending spree is not that it was a waste of money, it's that the money has been stolen in plain sight from our children and grandchildren. Every dollar of the national debt is a dollar our children will not have the freedom to spend or to save for themselves. Every paycheck they receive will be smaller their family budgets, tighter not because they chose to send their hard-earned money to Washington but because Washington took it and spent it before they even earned it - before they even got a chance to vote - for many of our children, before they were even born!

This is what "taxation without representation" looks like in the 21st Century. And it means our nation's fiscal mess is not just a math problem, it's a moral problem and we owe our children much better leadership.

Be the first to know

* I understand and agree that registration on or use of this site constitutes agreement to its user agreement and privacy policy.

Be the first to know

* I understand and agree that registration on or use of this site constitutes agreement to its user agreement and privacy policy.

The new majority in the House of Representatives believes we need to face our spending problem head-on - and that's why we unanimously voted to ban all earmarks in the 112th Congress. I stand before you as a reformed earmarker. I know this reform is long overdue and I know it's just the first step we needed to take to get back on the path of fiscal discipline.

More difficult spending decisions lie ahead and I will help lead this effort as Chairman of the Appropriations Subcommittee for Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education. This is the subcommittee that has the power to end funding for ObamaCare . It's the subcommittee with major responsibilities for entitlement reform.

My colleagues and I will help re-establish fiscal discipline in Washington but that doesn't mean the battle for states' rights is over. Instead, we can already see the battle shifting: from the halls of the Capitol to the layers of federal bureaucracy that are imposing huge new regulatory burdens on the American people. And even when Congress hasn't given federal agencies more power, they've taken it anyway: when Congress didn't pass the disastrous "cap and trade" bill, the Environmental Protection Agency said: no problem! We'll just reclassify carbon dioxide - that's the stuff you and I are exhaling right this very minute as a "pollutant" that they now can regulate under the Clean Air Act.

And last week, the EPA claimed that it now has jurisdiction over spilled milk. I am not making this up.

You see, Congress gave the agency responsibility over oil spills - which makes sense. But someone told them that milk contains animal fat - which is form of non-petroleum oil. And ... well you get the picture. The impact on Montana's dairy farmers could be severe not to mention surreal. They may soon have to develop "emergency management plans" for spilled milk - as well as train "first responders." I say: If anyone wants a "first responder" for spilled milk, just adopt a cat!

Here's another example of regulatory overreach that hits us close to home here in Montana. A lot of us were surprised to learn that the Obama Administration developed a secret plan in the Interior Department to take over millions of acres of our state by declaring them a "national monument." To borrow a phrase from President Obama: "Let me be clear." No additional national monuments should be created in our state without input from the people of Montana and the approval of Congress. I've introduced legislation to stop federal bureaucrats from abusing their regulatory powers and I assure you I will be on high alert for any other power grabs that could impact our state.

As I'm fighting the battle for states' rights in Washington, I encourage all of you to continue to make the case for good government here in Helena. I implore you: keep the pressure on us in Congress. Show us how the new health care law is busting the state budget and don't make it any easier for it to be implemented in our state.

Don't wait on Congress to send a balanced budget amendment to the states for ratification: instead, send a petition to Congress to force us to call a constitutional convention if we fail to act! And continue to pass resolutions to call attention to our broken immigration system and other ways the federal government is failing the people of Montana.

By far the best thing you can do is to continue to be one of the best performing "laboratories of democracy" in America: by keeping government spending and taxes under control; by making sure Montana remains a great place to build a business and raise a family; by showing that Montana doesn't have a lot to learn from Washington though we do have a lot of common sense solutions to share.

I believe over the next several years we will witness the implosion of the "paternalistic" model of government: California has doubled down on its high tax, high regulation experiment with big government. Illinois just raised personal income taxes by 66 percent! Our state has a tremendous opportunity: to present itself as be the compelling contrast to these failed models; to help restore faith in limited government and to prove the wisdom of states' rights.

Whatever happens over the next 90 days and during your entire term in office, I hope you will remember to be humble in your public service as I am.

None of us are perfect creatures in the sight of God - but all of us our made in His image - and our oaths call us to live and lead by his example of love and self-sacrifice.

Also remember that our freedom isn't free. Even as we speak, Montanans are defending liberty in far off places that are full of danger. Everybody says to pray for our troops - and of course we all should. But we should also try to see America - and our beloved Montana - as our troops see it: a place well worth defending; Because it remains a land of promise.

God Bless You All.

And God Bless the Great State of Montana.

# # #


Be the first to know

* I understand and agree that registration on or use of this site constitutes agreement to its user agreement and privacy policy.

Load comments