Our Readers Speak: Lawmakers differ on coal extraction positions

2012-10-05T00:15:00Z Our Readers Speak: Lawmakers differ on coal extraction positionsBy MJ Williams Montana Standard
October 05, 2012 12:15 am  • 

As a fourth-generation Montanan, I find Mark Perea’s position on resource extraction troubling.

The balance between jobs and the natural environment has been contentious, and for good reason.

When the copper kings ruled in Butte, the loss of life was constant. Sometimes it was fast and sometimes it was agonizingly slow. When the ore was too costly to mine, the company just moved on.

Boom and bust has been around as long as statehood. Why would we want to abandon what we have learned the hard way — that industry unregulated, has no real interest in community.

What is Mr. Perea really saying when he asserts: “I believe each person should choose his or her own path. It seems most adults would choose a traditional family with a father and mother who raise their children to be productive members of society.”

Would he deny equal protection to untraditional families? There is way too much gray area in his thinking for me to consider him as a responsible legislator.

Christine Kauffman has served many years in the Montana Legislature. She’s a woman of integrity, in-depth knowledge, and responsibility to the larger community. Her work speaks for itself.

MJ Williams

Basin

 

Copyright 2015 Montana Standard. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

(1) Comments

  1. Docwaters
    Report Abuse
    Docwaters - October 05, 2012 11:15 am
    I thought the letter was about coal mining then the writer changes to non-traditional family protection. Odd.

Civil Dialogue

We provide this community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Name-calling, crude language and personal abuse are not welcome. Moderators will monitor comments with an eye toward maintaining a high level of civility in this forum. Our comment policy explains the rules of the road for registered commenters. If you receive an error after submitting a comment, please contact us at editor@mtstandard.com.

If your comment was removed or isn't appearing online, perhaps:

  1. You called someone an idiot, a racist, a dope, a moron, etc. Please, no name-calling or profanity (or veiled profanity -- #$%^&*).
  2. You rambled, failed to stay on topic or exhibited troll-like behavior intended to hijack the discussion at hand.
  3. YOU SHOUTED YOUR COMMENT IN ALL CAPS. This is hard to read and annoys readers.
  4. You have issues with a business. Have a bad meal? Feel you were overcharged at the store? New car is a lemon? Contact the business directly with your customer service concerns.
  5. You included an e-mail address or phone number, pretended to be someone you aren't or offered a comment that makes no sense.
  6. You accused someone of a crime or assigned guilt or punishment to someone suspected of a crime.
  7. Your comment is in really poor taste.
Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick

Great Butte Businesses

Vote now! Question of the Week

Loading…

Do you think the state, ARCO, EPA and Butte-Silver Bow should agree to remove the Parrot Tailings as part of a negotiated Superfund consent decree? Vote at www.mtstandard.com.

View Results