Meatless Monday not better for health and the environment

2013-02-07T00:00:00Z Meatless Monday not better for health and the environment Montana Standard
February 07, 2013 12:00 am

It has come to my attention that Meatless Monday is being portrayed as a benefit to both your health and the environment. Unfortunately, that is incorrect.

VIV magazine claims that if you cut meat out of your diet one day per week, you can lose weight and become healthier overnight. I wish that was true. It would be nice to find a solution that easy for all of us who have struggled with weight issues.  

Personally, I have lost 50 pounds in just more than 18 months by eating red meat every day. Zinc, iron and protein are all found in red meat and often are key ingredients missing from our diets. Don’t forget that red meat also contains essential amino acids and vitamin A. The list goes on. 

Did you know that, while three ounces of lean beef has 180 calories, in order to get the same amount of protein you must eat seven tablespoons of peanut butter, which has more than 600 calories? I challenge you, instead of Meatless Monday, make it Meatful Monday but pick healthier, lean cuts. I bet you will see a healthy you in the near future. 

Yes, the environment and global warming has us all concerned, but following Meatless Monday is not the way to rectify this alarming situation. According to Jude Capper, of the Washington State University Department of Animal Sciences,“The Environmental Working Group claims that national carbon emissions would be reduced by 4.5 percent if everyone in the U.S. chose a vegetarian diet. This is an impressive achievement, given that the Environmental Protection Agency cites livestock production (including poultry and horses) as accounting for only 3.1 percent of total U.S. emissions.”

Let’s do the math based on the EPA numbers. The EWG report focuses on the impact of red meat and dairy, so if we remove poultry and horses from the EPA’s 3.1-percent figure, we get a total red meat and dairy impact of 3.05 percent. Divide that by seven, and the impact of one meatless day per week is equal to 0.44 percent of the U.S. carbon footprint — and that’s assuming that the U.S. population of 311 million people all adopt this lifestyle change. 

It’s a tiny fraction of the impact that we can make on the national carbon footprint. So maybe on Monday, walk or carpool to work. Not only will you be healthier and happier, but it’s better for the environment. 

Karoline Rose

Box 508

Three Forks

Copyright 2015 Montana Standard. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

(1) Comments

  1. WarpedDimensions
    Report Abuse
    WarpedDimensions - February 07, 2013 10:27 pm
    The meat industry has a very significant impact on global warming.
    "Livestock production accounts for 18 percent of global greenhouse gas emissions, including 9 percent of carbon dioxide and 37 percent of methane gas emissions worldwide, according to the Livestock, Environment and Development (LEAD) Initiative, an international consortium of government and private agencies based at FAO headquarters in Rome." - Stanford Woods Institute for the Environment.

    I highly recommend you watch Mark Brittman's TED talk entitled, "What's wrong with what we eat."
    http://www.ted.com/talks/mark_bittman_on_what_s_wrong_with_what_we_eat.html

    He doesn't think that we should stop eating meat but he does make a compelling argument for why we should reducing our meat intake.

    I also highly recommend reading the report entitled; "The China Study" written by Dr. Colin Campbell; the Jacob Gould Schurman Professor Emeritus of Nutritional Biochemistry at Cornell University. The report details the connection between nutrition and heart disease, diabetes, and cancer. It also examines the source of nutritional confusion produced by powerful lobbies, government entities, and opportunistic scientists.

Civil Dialogue

We provide this community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Name-calling, crude language and personal abuse are not welcome. Moderators will monitor comments with an eye toward maintaining a high level of civility in this forum. Our comment policy explains the rules of the road for registered commenters. If you receive an error after submitting a comment, please contact us at editor@mtstandard.com.

If your comment was removed or isn't appearing online, perhaps:

  1. You called someone an idiot, a racist, a dope, a moron, etc. Please, no name-calling or profanity (or veiled profanity -- #$%^&*).
  2. You rambled, failed to stay on topic or exhibited troll-like behavior intended to hijack the discussion at hand.
  3. YOU SHOUTED YOUR COMMENT IN ALL CAPS. This is hard to read and annoys readers.
  4. You have issues with a business. Have a bad meal? Feel you were overcharged at the store? New car is a lemon? Contact the business directly with your customer service concerns.
  5. You included an e-mail address or phone number, pretended to be someone you aren't or offered a comment that makes no sense.
  6. You accused someone of a crime or assigned guilt or punishment to someone suspected of a crime.
  7. Your comment is in really poor taste.
Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick

Great Butte Businesses

Vote now! Question of the Week

Loading…

Do you think dogs on leashes should be allowed in all Butte parks?” Go online to www.mtstandard.com to vote.

View Results