Another view: Leaving behind ‘No Child’ law

2010-03-25T00:00:00Z Another view: Leaving behind ‘No Child’ law— The Kansas City Star Montana Standard
March 25, 2010 12:00 am  • 

For almost 10 years, educators have railed against the No Child Left Behind law, saying it imposed unachievable testing mandates and was underfunded. They were right.

The 2002 signature law of the Bush administration forced teachers to teach to standardized tests, but no national standards for academic achievement existed. No Child Left Behind resulted in labeling more than a third of the nation’s public schools as failures even though states in their own patchwork way ginned up exams that actually lowered the academic bar.

Finally relief may be on the horizon. The Obama administration is proposing to dismantle the existing law and replacing it with one that helps struggling schools make progress instead of penalizing those that don’t meet benchmarks.

The push is for states to enact standards ensuring that graduating high school students are ready for college or careers by 2020, replacing No Child Left Behind’s goal of grade-level proficiency by 2014.

A big plus is states would be able to use subjects other than reading and math to measure whether they are meeting the new federal goals. No Child Left Behind excluded such subjects as art, music, history and social science. Those areas were often neglected in the classroom.

The Obama administration is pushing for the new law this year, which seems ambitious. But the nation’s schools certainly could use the additional resources and flexibility the law promises for high-poverty schools. There is some pain in the proposal for the lowest performing 5 percent of schools, which could be subjected to aggressive measures such as state takeover, replacing the principal, replacing half the teaching staff or closing the school.

The proposed change has pitfalls that should be addressed.

It puts high expectations on teachers to lift underperforming students to academic excellence. The Obama administration must ensure teachers will get the support, training and collaboration time they need to be able to do the additional work.

Also, the bill must not follow in the footsteps of No Child Left Behind and impose a host of unfunded mandates on states and school districts. And it should provide for a national exam that students would have to take to prove they are

proficient in core subjects.

The president and Congress must work together on a plan to transform schools so that they provide students with the skills needed to be successful.

— The Kansas City Star

Copyright 2015 Montana Standard. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

(2) Comments

  1. curmudgeon
    Report Abuse
    curmudgeon - March 25, 2010 11:48 am
    Education is NOT a manufacturing process.
  2. oldie
    Report Abuse
    oldie - March 25, 2010 9:23 am
    How long have we had to put up with this idiocy, 8 long years? Who came up with this stupid idea in the first place? Whoever it is, we ought to be aware of it anytime they speak again. The "No Child Left Behind Act" flag should be waved wildly every time their name is in print or mentioned on TV. Put their picture in a data base on the internet. They should be forced to knock on every door in the neighborhood and introduce themselves as the dunce who came up with "No Child Left Behind".

Civil Dialogue

We provide this community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Name-calling, crude language and personal abuse are not welcome. Moderators will monitor comments with an eye toward maintaining a high level of civility in this forum. Our comment policy explains the rules of the road for registered commenters. If you receive an error after submitting a comment, please contact us at

If your comment was removed or isn't appearing online, perhaps:

  1. You called someone an idiot, a racist, a dope, a moron, etc. Please, no name-calling or profanity (or veiled profanity -- #$%^&*).
  2. You rambled, failed to stay on topic or exhibited troll-like behavior intended to hijack the discussion at hand.
  3. YOU SHOUTED YOUR COMMENT IN ALL CAPS. This is hard to read and annoys readers.
  4. You have issues with a business. Have a bad meal? Feel you were overcharged at the store? New car is a lemon? Contact the business directly with your customer service concerns.
  5. You included an e-mail address or phone number, pretended to be someone you aren't or offered a comment that makes no sense.
  6. You accused someone of a crime or assigned guilt or punishment to someone suspected of a crime.
  7. Your comment is in really poor taste.
Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick

Great Butte Businesses

Vote now! Question of the Week


Do you favor Butte-Silver Bow’s proposal to expand angled parking, add bike lanes and remove up to 10 traffic signals Uptown?

View Results