Digital Academy: Revamp online policy

2010-11-21T00:15:00Z Digital Academy: Revamp online policyStandard View Montana Standard
November 21, 2010 12:15 am  • 

The offering of online classes must be available for all of the Butte students, be they in public schools, parochial schools or home schooled.

Anything less will bring an unwanted lawsuit to School District No. 1.

Butte decided to review the new policy after state Rep. Jon Sesso, D-Butte, said he'd heard from constituents who are miffed over a requirement that students be enrolled at Butte High to take classes online.

Sesso said that the Legislature intended for any state resident to be able to take the program and keeping students out could jeopardize program funding in the upcoming session. Gov. Brian Schweitzer has set aside $2.4 million in his budget for the Digital Academy.

One of the side benefits of the state-funded Digital Academy is to boost student numbers so that schools can get state reimbursement funding.

A possible downside is if so many students take calculus online, for example, but not in the classroom, some school districts could lose their calculus teacher.

Linda Reksten, superintendent of the Butte schools, said the district is working on a policy to include all students, based on policies in similar Class AA schools.

Today, the policies across the state are inconsistent.

Helena allows freshmen, sophomores and juniors to take one class per year, and seniors two. Bozeman requires part-time students to be enrolled in a minimum of two classes - one in-house and one from the Digital Academy. They could take an unlimited number of online classes, too.

Butte initially wanted part-time students to be enrolled in a minimum of four classes per year. Smaller districts are requiring at least four classes, and are not getting pushback as in Butte. Most likely Butte will set the minimum at two.

Another downside is the possibility that having part-time students in a public school, who don't graduate from there, would affect the school's graduation rate.

Perhaps the Legislature should look at a uniform policy.

One thing is for sure. The state needs to continue its funding of the program.

The Legislature can work out the kinks so that students are not left uncounted, schools are not left with an unfunded mandate and graduation rates are fair across the board.

 

Copyright 2015 Montana Standard. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

(2) Comments

  1. newsfan
    Report Abuse
    newsfan - November 21, 2010 8:05 am
    Unfortunately, John Sesso does not know NCLB. He is wrong about the digital Academy's effect on graduation rates, and the law requires that students in it are enrolled in public school. And isn't it interesting that I have heard from people who were at that meeting that the Standard misrepresented his comments?
  2. mcjensen
    Report Abuse
    mcjensen - November 21, 2010 4:47 am
    The overarching issue here is how the state funds are school. As long as its funding formula is based on head count, school systems with decreasing enrollments fear how innovations will affect them. Let's hope Schweitzer's digital academy has some incentives attached...

Civil Dialogue

We provide this community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Name-calling, crude language and personal abuse are not welcome. Moderators will monitor comments with an eye toward maintaining a high level of civility in this forum. Our comment policy explains the rules of the road for registered commenters. If you receive an error after submitting a comment, please contact us at editor@mtstandard.com.

If your comment was removed or isn't appearing online, perhaps:

  1. You called someone an idiot, a racist, a dope, a moron, etc. Please, no name-calling or profanity (or veiled profanity -- #$%^&*).
  2. You rambled, failed to stay on topic or exhibited troll-like behavior intended to hijack the discussion at hand.
  3. YOU SHOUTED YOUR COMMENT IN ALL CAPS. This is hard to read and annoys readers.
  4. You have issues with a business. Have a bad meal? Feel you were overcharged at the store? New car is a lemon? Contact the business directly with your customer service concerns.
  5. You included an e-mail address or phone number, pretended to be someone you aren't or offered a comment that makes no sense.
  6. You accused someone of a crime or assigned guilt or punishment to someone suspected of a crime.
  7. Your comment is in really poor taste.
Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick

Great Butte Businesses

Vote now! Question of the Week

Loading…

Do you think the state, ARCO, EPA and Butte-Silver Bow should agree to remove the Parrot Tailings as part of a negotiated Superfund consent decree? Vote at www.mtstandard.com.

View Results