Report: County given ‘F’ on air quality; wildfires blamed

2014-04-30T06:00:00Z 2014-04-30T08:06:53Z Report: County given ‘F’ on air quality; wildfires blamed Montana Standard

The American Lung Association has given Butte-Silver Bow County an F for its air quality, but the report and a health official say part of that is due to summer wildfires in Idaho and Montana in 2012.

Paul Riley, environmental monitoring director for the Butte-Silver Bow Health Department, also said an air-quality ordinance enacted in 2012 and education about wood-burning stoves are paying off.

“As far as air quality in the winter months, which our program directly addresses, our air quality has improved,” Riley said Tuesday.

The lung association’s “State of the Air” report gave Silver Bow, Lewis and Clark (Helena), Missoula and Ravalli (Hamilton) counties an F for 24-hour particle pollution levels based on data compiled by the Environmental Protection Agency from 2010 through 2012.

The spikes in short-term particle pollution — also called soot — were related to the wildfires of 2012, according to the report released Wednesday.

The health effects of small-particle air pollution are numerous, especially on children, the elderly and those with underlying cardiac or respiratory disease such as asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, or COPD.

The small particles generated from wildfires or other sources can easily become inhaled into the lungs, leading to inflammation and lower-lung functions manifesting as such symptoms as coughs, wheezing and difficulty breathing.

The report said Montana counties are some of the cleanest for ozone pollution, but particle pollution continues to be a problem in several counties, including Silver Bow.

Flathead (Kalispell), Powder River (Broadus) and Richland (Sidney) counties got As on the report.

Due to smoke from the 2012 fires, Missoula had its worst-ever number of unhealthy days with an average of 8.5 over the three years, the report said.

Silver Bow County, which also got an F on last year’s report, averaged 8.7 unhealthy days, ranking it 17th worst in the nation.

Ravalli County, even more heavily impacted by 2012 wildfires in Idaho, ranked eighth nationally for short-term particle pollution and had 23.7 days of unhealthy air.

Butte’s air problems are tied largely to residential woodstove emissions and its location in a mountain valley, where cold temperatures can trap particulate pollution during winter inversions.

Riley said the wildfires in 2012 – events beyond Butte’s control – somewhat skewed the results used by the lung association in its report.

He said from this past November through March, particle pollution never exceeded a federal threshold for violation over a 24-hour period.

“This last winter was one of the first in a long time we didn’t exceed that,” he said. “Going into this part of the year we’ve usually had two or three days that exceeded the federal standard.”

The readings can be affected by natural factors such as the cold and wind, but Riley said an air-quality ordinance enacted in Butte-Silver Bow in 2012 and recent education efforts likely are having an effect.

The local law requires that wood-burning stoves installed after May 2012 meet EPA standards and it updated restrictions on outdoor burning, among other things.

“We are also getting information out to general public about changes in our program and bringing them up to speed about clean-burning methods and using the proper wood and being considerate of their neighbors,” Riley said.

Riley said local officials also are considering the possibility of a new program that would help those with lower incomes replace their old wood-burning stoves with newer ones that burn hotter and cleaner.

— Reach Smith at or 406-496-5511.

Copyright 2015 Montana Standard. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

(2) Comments

  1. Docwaters
    Report Abuse
    Docwaters - April 30, 2014 2:43 pm
    You would think the environuts would like wood burning stoves as they use a renewable resource not fossil fuels. Wait, they do release that nasty CO2 as do we all as we breathe out.
  2. srvdmytym
    Report Abuse
    srvdmytym - April 30, 2014 10:39 am
    I found this article to be very interesting.....and completely lacking in substance! To blame the "air pollution" on wood burning stoves is a total joke....there was NOTHING mentioned about the constant bombardment of dust from the pit and the leach dumps!!! Have you ever looked to the north when the wind is blowing....or even on a relatively calm day.....the dust clouds are enormous.....if you have tried to keep your house "dust free" you also know, there is much more going on than wood burning stoves and "wildfires"! The woodburning stove agenda is an easy pick for the "greenies"....of course like so many other agendas they have, they don't do much research. Current manufactured woodstoves are extremely efficient....some of them are close to 90% efficient or better, and actually "reburn" particulate from the actual fire.....but of course that doesn't "fit" the environmentalist agenda! Go out to the Silverbow Hearth and Home and look at some of the new might get a surprise! Meanwhile, don't tell me that all of the pollution in Butte is from woodburners and wildfires.....Phoooooey!

Civil Dialogue

We provide this community forum for readers to exchange ideas and opinions on the news of the day. Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Name-calling, crude language and personal abuse are not welcome. Moderators will monitor comments with an eye toward maintaining a high level of civility in this forum. Our comment policy explains the rules of the road for registered commenters. If you receive an error after submitting a comment, please contact us at

If your comment was removed or isn't appearing online, perhaps:

  1. You called someone an idiot, a racist, a dope, a moron, etc. Please, no name-calling or profanity (or veiled profanity -- #$%^&*).
  2. You rambled, failed to stay on topic or exhibited troll-like behavior intended to hijack the discussion at hand.
  3. YOU SHOUTED YOUR COMMENT IN ALL CAPS. This is hard to read and annoys readers.
  4. You have issues with a business. Have a bad meal? Feel you were overcharged at the store? New car is a lemon? Contact the business directly with your customer service concerns.
  5. You included an e-mail address or phone number, pretended to be someone you aren't or offered a comment that makes no sense.
  6. You accused someone of a crime or assigned guilt or punishment to someone suspected of a crime.
  7. Your comment is in really poor taste.
Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick

Montana Standard News Topics